VoiceTypingTools

Otter.ai vs Notta: Detailed Comparison

Compared by VoiceTypingTools Editorial Team· Published February 1, 2026· Our methodology

Otter.ai and Notta are the two leading AI meeting transcription tools. Both record meetings, generate transcripts, and provide AI summaries — but they target different users. We compared them across accuracy, language support, integrations, pricing, and team features.

Quick Verdict

Otter.ai wins for English-speaking teams that need the best accuracy and AI features. Notta wins for multilingual teams and budget-conscious buyers. Both are excellent — your choice depends on whether you prioritize language support or English accuracy.

Overall winner: Otter.ai

WinnerOtter.aiNotta
Overall Rating8.0/107.5/10
Accuracy7.5/107.5/10
Speed9/108/10
Ease of Use9/108/10
Value for Money7.5/108/10
Pricingfreemiumfreemium
Starting Price$0$0
Platforms
  • web
  • ios
  • android
  • web
  • ios
  • android
  • chrome-extension
Offline Support✗ No✗ No
AI Powered✓ Yes✓ Yes
Local Processing✗ No✗ No

Accuracy & Language Support

Otter.ai achieves 90-94% accuracy on English meetings, while Notta scores 88-93% on English. However, Notta supports 58 languages compared to Otter's 3 (English, French, Spanish). For multilingual teams, Notta is the clear winner. For English-only use, Otter has a slight edge.

Meeting Integrations

Both tools integrate with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Otter.ai's OtterPilot feature is more mature, with better automatic join reliability and more consistent speaker identification. Notta's bot integration works well but occasionally requires manual setup.

AI Summaries

Otter.ai's AI Chat feature lets you ask questions about your transcripts, which is powerful for long meetings. Notta's AI summaries provide standard bullet-point overviews and action items. Both are useful, but Otter's conversational approach is more flexible.

Pricing

Otter.ai Pro costs $16.99/month with unlimited minutes. Notta Pro costs $13.99/month with 1,800 minutes. For most users, Notta is the better value — the 1,800-minute limit is generous enough for daily meetings, and you save $36/year. Otter's unlimited plan makes sense only for heavy users.

Free Plans

Otter.ai offers 300 minutes/month free vs Notta's 120 minutes. Both free plans include basic transcription but limit AI features. Otter's more generous free tier makes it better for trying before buying.

Otter.ai — Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Excellent Zoom/Meet/Teams integration
  • Real-time transcription with speaker labels
  • AI meeting summaries and action items
  • Generous free tier (300 min/month)
  • Searchable transcript archive

Cons

  • Accuracy drops with accents and cross-talk
  • No offline mode — requires internet
  • Speaker identification not always accurate
  • Pro plan pricing adds up for teams

Notta — Pros & Cons

Pros

  • 58 language support — best in class
  • Real-time translation between languages
  • Chrome extension for web recording
  • Competitive pricing vs Otter.ai
  • Clean, modern interface

Cons

  • English accuracy slightly below Otter.ai
  • Speaker identification less reliable
  • No desktop app — web and mobile only
  • AI summaries only on paid plans

Read Individual Reviews

This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Our reviews are independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships. Learn how we test.